On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 02:10:54PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> now threads can return BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_EXCL_RUN_IN_PROGRESS
> as defined in btrfs.h for the dev excl operation error in
> the FS, which means with this kernel would stop logging
> (almost an user error) into the /var/log/messages
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/ioctl.c           |   12 ++++--------
>  include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h |    3 +--
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> index 107c5f4..89f346c 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> @@ -1382,9 +1382,8 @@ static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_resize(struct file 
> *file,
>  
>       if (atomic_xchg(&root->fs_info->mutually_exclusive_operation_running,
>                       1)) {
> -             pr_info("btrfs: dev add/delete/balance/replace/resize operation 
> in progress\n");
>               mnt_drop_write_file(file);
> -             return -EINVAL;
> +             return BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_EXCL_RUN_IN_PROGRESS;
>       }
>  
>       mutex_lock(&root->fs_info->volume_mutex);
> @@ -2346,8 +2345,7 @@ static long btrfs_ioctl_add_dev(struct btrfs_root 
> *root, void __user *arg)
>  
>       if (atomic_xchg(&root->fs_info->mutually_exclusive_operation_running,
>                       1)) {
> -             pr_info("btrfs: dev add/delete/balance/replace/resize operation 
> in progress\n");
> -             return -EINVAL;
> +             return BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_EXCL_RUN_IN_PROGRESS;
>       }
>  
>       mutex_lock(&root->fs_info->volume_mutex);
> @@ -3638,8 +3636,7 @@ static long btrfs_ioctl_dev_replace(struct btrfs_root 
> *root, void __user *arg)
>               if (atomic_xchg(
>                       &root->fs_info->mutually_exclusive_operation_running,
>                       1)) {
> -                     pr_info("btrfs: dev add/delete/balance/replace/resize 
> operation in progress\n");
> -                     ret = -EINPROGRESS;
> +                     ret = BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_EXCL_RUN_IN_PROGRESS;
>               } else {
>                       ret = btrfs_dev_replace_start(root, p);
>                       atomic_set(
> @@ -3883,8 +3880,7 @@ again:
>       } else {
>               /* this is (1) */
>               mutex_unlock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
> -             pr_info("btrfs: dev add/delete/balance/replace/resize operation 
> in progress\n");
> -             ret = -EINVAL;
> +             ret = BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_EXCL_RUN_IN_PROGRESS;
>               goto out;
>       }
>  
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h b/include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h
> index 90d7bd9..182305f 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h
> @@ -505,8 +505,7 @@ static inline char *btrfs_err_str(enum btrfs_err_code 
> err_code)
>               case BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_ONLY_WRITABLE:
>                       return "unable to remove the only writeable device";
>               case BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_EXCL_RUN_IN_PROGRESS:
> -                     return "add/delete/balance/replace/resize operation "\
> -                             "in progress";
> +                     return "add/delete/balance/replace/resize operation in 
> progress";
>               default:
>                       return NULL;

This is an unnecessary change.  Thanks,

Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to