On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 08:30:44AM +0100, Stefan Behrens wrote: > On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:50:43 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > > I hit this problem with my no holes patch and it made me realize what the > > problem was for bz 60834. If the first item in the leaf is an inline > > extent and > > we try to read anything starting from disk_bytenr onward we will read off > > the > > end of the leaf. So we need to check to see what it's type is, and if it's > > not > > REG we can just break out. This should fix this problem. Thanks, > > > > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> > > --- > > fs/btrfs/backref.c | 1 + > > fs/btrfs/send.c | 10 +++++----- > > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c > > index 3775947..b763f10 100644 > > --- a/fs/btrfs/backref.c > > +++ b/fs/btrfs/backref.c > > @@ -1051,6 +1051,7 @@ static int btrfs_find_all_leafs(struct > > btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > > > > if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOENT) { > > free_leaf_list(*leafs); > > + ulist_free(*leafs); > > An en passant fix for which problem? >
Oops, sorry about that, not a problem just me doing other things, I'll drop that bit. Thanks, Josef -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
