On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Stan Hoeppner <s...@hardwarefreak.com> wrote: > Hi David, > > On 11/21/2013 3:07 AM, David Brown wrote: <SNIP> >> Shouldn't we be talking about RAID 15 here, rather than RAID 51 ? I >> interpret "RAID 15" to be like "RAID 10" - a raid5 set of raid1 mirrors, >> while "RAID 51" would be a raid1 mirror of raid5 sets. I am certain >> that you mean a raid5 set of raid1 pairs - I just think you've got the >> name wrong. > > Now that you mention it, yes, RAID 15 would fit much better with > convention. Not sure why I thought 51. So it's RAID 15 from here. <SNIP>
For us casual readers & RAID users could you clarify RAID15? Would that be a bunch of RAID1's grouped together in what appears to be a RAID5 to the system? Thanks, Mark -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
