Chris Murphy posted on Mon, 25 Nov 2013 23:40:49 -0700 as excerpted: > Is there supposed to be an /sbin/fsck.btrfs? I'm seeing a handful of > threads indicating some idea of having it just do a no-op like fsck.xfs > does, but then also the idea that /etc/fstab should correctly set > fs_passno to 0 instead of such trickery. > > I ask due to systemd-fstab-generator seemingly getting the idea from > Fedora 20's default /etc/fstab that btrfs should have its file system > checked, and during offline updates, systemd tries to do this, doesn't > find /sbin/fsck.btrfs, and then has several dozen fits. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034563 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862871 > > So the question, is there supposed to be (one day) a faux > /sbin/fsck.btrfs? Or should things always check /etc/fstab fs_passno and > honor the fact there is really no such thing?
Just symlink/copy fsck.btrfs to (/bin/)true. https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/FAQ#What.27s_the_difference_between_btrfsck_and_fsck.btrfs Or just do the /etc/fstab fs_passno = 0 thing, which is what I did with reiserfs, so no change in that regard here when I switched to btrfs for most partitions. But I'm on gentoo and haven't opted to drink the systemd koolaid yet, so what it thinks about that I wouldn't know. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
