If no chunks need to be recovered, skip the recover works,
meanwhile the user won't be annoyed by the "ask_user".

Signed-off-by: Gui Hecheng <[email protected]>
---
 chunk-recover.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/chunk-recover.c b/chunk-recover.c
index ae0d318..45d6eae 100644
--- a/chunk-recover.c
+++ b/chunk-recover.c
@@ -1685,6 +1685,9 @@ int btrfs_recover_chunk_tree(char *path, int verbose, int 
yes)
                 * droppped from the fs. Don't deal with them now, we will
                 * check it after the fs is opened.
                 */
+       } else {
+               fprintf(stderr, "Check chunks successfully with no orphans\n");
+               goto fail_rc;
        }
 
        root = open_ctree_with_broken_chunk(&rc);
-- 
1.8.0.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to