On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 09:25:46PM +0800, Wang Shilong wrote: > Here we are not going to free memory, no need to remove every node > one by one, just init root node here is ok.
Looks fine, but we need to make sure that it passes the regression test since you're working on an old bug. -liubo > > Cc: Liu Bo <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <[email protected]> > --- > fs/btrfs/ulist.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ulist.c b/fs/btrfs/ulist.c > index b0a523b2..35f5de9 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/ulist.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/ulist.c > @@ -207,9 +207,6 @@ int ulist_add_merge(struct ulist *ulist, u64 val, u64 aux, > void *old = NULL; > int i; > > - for (i = 0; i < ulist->nnodes; i++) > - rb_erase(&ulist->nodes[i].rb_node, &ulist->root); > - > /* > * if nodes_alloced == ULIST_SIZE no memory has been allocated > * yet, so pass NULL to krealloc > @@ -234,6 +231,7 @@ int ulist_add_merge(struct ulist *ulist, u64 val, u64 aux, > * pointers, so we have to do it ourselves. Otherwise we may > * be bitten by crashes. > */ > + ulist->root = RB_ROOT; > for (i = 0; i < ulist->nnodes; i++) { > ret = ulist_rbtree_insert(ulist, &ulist->nodes[i]); > if (ret < 0) > -- > 1.8.3.1 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
