On 02/05/2014 11:14 AM, Wang Shilong wrote:
Hi Filipe,
So i knew what was wrong here, we need found_key while
btrfs_previous_extent_item() did set
it properly..^_^
I will send a v2 to fix this, thanks!
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Wang Shilong <wangshilong1...@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Wang Shilong <wangsl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
Since we have introduced btrfs_previous_extent_item() to search previous
extent item, just switch into it.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
Hi Shilong,
This patch is making btrfs/004 fail for me, consistently:
I was trying to reproduce this xfstest failure(though we have known what's
wrong with my previous patch).
I did not really hit 004 failure, but i can reproduce btrfs/030 fail
consistently, i think you might be interested in this:
FSTYP -- btrfs
PLATFORM -- Linux/i686 wangsl 3.13.0-4-default+
MKFS_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdb2
MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdb2 /mnt/scratch
btrfs/030 [failed, exit status 1] - output mismatch (see /home/wangsl/tools/xfstests/results//btrfs/030.out.bad)
--- tests/btrfs/030.out 2014-02-01 01:01:11.261999486 +0800
+++ /home/wangsl/tools/xfstests/results//btrfs/030.out.bad 2014-02-05
23:56:31.740988010 +0800
@@ -1 +1,3 @@
QA output created by 030
+failed: '/home/wangsl/tools/xfstests/src/fssum -r
/tmp/tmp.30GWDU8xaU/2.fssum /mnt/scratch/mysnap2'
+(see /home/wangsl/tools/xfstests/results//btrfs/030.full for details)
...
(Run 'diff -u tests/btrfs/030.out
/home/wangsl/tools/xfstests/results//btrfs/030.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
Ran: btrfs/030
Failures: btrfs/030
Failed 1 of 1 tests
dmesg show more information:
[ 818.988731] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 29978 at fs/btrfs/send.c:5427
btrfs_ioctl_send+0x34b/0xeb0 [btrfs]()
[ 818.988733] Modules linked in: xt_tcpudp xt_pkttype xt_LOG xt_limit
ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_raw ipt_REJECT
iptable_raw xt_CT iptable_filter ip6table_mangle nf_conntrack_netbios_ns
nf_conntrack_broadcast nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 ip_tables xt_conntrack
nf_conntrack ip6table_filter ip6_tables x_tables fuse bnep snd_ens1371 coretemp
crc32_pclmul gameport crc32c_intel snd_rawmidi aesni_intel snd_ac97_codec
sr_mod cdrom ata_generic ac97_bus snd_pcm snd_seq ppdev ata_piix snd_timer
snd_seq_device ablk_helper ahci btusb snd libahci cryptd bluetooth libata
vmw_balloon lrw aes_i586 xts serio_raw gf128mul vmw_vmci parport_pc pcspkr
soundcore mptctl snd_page_alloc parport pcnet32 i2c_piix4 shpchp joydev floppy
mii ac button rfkill sg autofs4 btrfs raid6_pq xor linear hid_generic
[ 818.988766] usbhid hid uhci_hcd vmwgfx ehci_pci ehci_hcd processor
thermal_sys usbcore hwmon ttm usb_common mptspi mptscsih mptbase
scsi_transport_spi drm i2c_core scsi_dh_rdac scsi_dh_hp_sw scsi_dh_emc
scsi_dh_alua scsi_dh dm_snapshot dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod
[ 818.988786] CPU: 0 PID: 29978 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W
3.13.0-4-default+ #44
[ 818.988787] Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX
Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 07/02/2012
[ 818.988789] 00000000 00000000 c9561cf8 c06a8276 00000000 c9561d28 c02432f9
c080cf24
[ 818.988793] 00000000 0000751a fa1b7b6e 00001533 fa1a647b fa1a647b dade1140
dade1138
[ 818.988797] dade1000 c9561d38 c024338d 00000009 00000000 c9561df4 fa1a647b
dade1000
[ 818.988800] Call Trace:
[ 818.988858] [<c06a8276>] dump_stack+0x41/0x52
[ 818.988941] [<c02432f9>] warn_slowpath_common+0x79/0x90
[ 818.988962] [<fa1a647b>] ? btrfs_ioctl_send+0x34b/0xeb0 [btrfs]
[ 818.988975] [<fa1a647b>] ? btrfs_ioctl_send+0x34b/0xeb0 [btrfs]
[ 818.988977] [<c024338d>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20
[ 818.988990] [<fa1a647b>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0x34b/0xeb0 [btrfs]
[ 818.989004] [<fa171250>] ? update_ioctl_balance_args+0x2c0/0x2c0 [btrfs]
[ 818.989017] [<fa1714f8>] btrfs_ioctl+0x2a8/0x33f0 [btrfs]
[ 818.989021] [<c026f956>] ? update_cfs_rq_blocked_load+0x116/0x170
[ 818.989023] [<c026fa55>] ? __enqueue_entity+0x65/0x70
[ 818.989025] [<c0274aec>] ? enqueue_entity+0x31c/0xe60
[ 818.989028] [<c0275c01>] ? enqueue_task_fair+0x5d1/0x7d0
[ 818.989031] [<c02082b8>] ? sched_clock+0x8/0x10
[ 818.989043] [<fa171250>] ? update_ioctl_balance_args+0x2c0/0x2c0 [btrfs]
[ 818.989048] [<c03569a2>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x2d2/0x4b0
[ 818.989051] [<c0269ceb>] ? resched_task+0x3b/0x50
[ 818.989053] [<c026a6bd>] ? check_preempt_curr+0x5d/0x80
[ 818.989056] [<c026c305>] ? wake_up_new_task+0xe5/0x140
[ 818.989058] [<c0242780>] ? do_fork+0x100/0x2b0
[ 818.989061] [<c0356bd8>] SyS_ioctl+0x58/0x80
[ 818.989063] [<c06b4b59>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x28
[ 818.989065] ---[ end trace 7f6e499355102e48 ]---
[ 819.101601] BTRFS: device fsid 061bb332-4adc-4489-9a79-0931007b9d51 devid 1
transid 4 /dev/sdb2
[ 819.117930] BTRFS: device fsid 061bb332-4adc-4489-9a79-0931007b9d51 devid 1
transid 4 /dev/sdb2
[ 819.118653] BTRFS info (device sdb2): disk space caching is enabled
[ 819.118655] BTRFS: flagging fs with big metadata feature
[ 819.119958] BTRFS: creating UUID tree
[ 819.271220] BTRFS: device fsid 67b57caa-2cde-40b5-b3b4-c4732bfeacd9 devid 1
transid 247 /dev/sdb1
[ 819.272128] BTRFS info (device sdb1): disk space caching is enabled
I test with latest btrfs-next and xfstest, with/without this patch applied, i
can not pass btrfs/030.
I don't know if there are some patches missing in btrfs-next.
Feel free to tell me if i miss something here.^_^
Ok I've reproduced this on my VM, I'll try and get this fixed up. Thanks,
Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
