In btrfs/003 of xfstest, it will check whether btrfs fi show can find
missing devices.

But before the patch, btrfs-progs will not check whether device missing
if given a mounted btrfs mountpoint/block device.
This patch fixes the bug and will pass btrfs/003.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Anand Jain <anand.j...@oracle.com>
---
changelog:
v1->v2: fix a uninitialized variant int print_one_fs.
---
 cmds-filesystem.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/cmds-filesystem.c b/cmds-filesystem.c
index 384d1b9..c1bdab4 100644
--- a/cmds-filesystem.c
+++ b/cmds-filesystem.c
@@ -363,6 +363,8 @@ static int print_one_fs(struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_info_args 
*fs_info,
                char *label, char *path)
 {
        int i;
+       int fd;
+       int missing = 0;
        char uuidbuf[BTRFS_UUID_UNPARSED_SIZE];
        struct btrfs_ioctl_dev_info_args *tmp_dev_info;
        int ret;
@@ -385,6 +387,14 @@ static int print_one_fs(struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_info_args 
*fs_info,
 
        for (i = 0; i < fs_info->num_devices; i++) {
                tmp_dev_info = (struct btrfs_ioctl_dev_info_args *)&dev_info[i];
+
+               /* Add check for missing devices even mounted */
+               fd = open((char *)tmp_dev_info->path, O_RDONLY);
+               if (fd < 0) {
+                       missing = 1;
+                       continue;
+               }
+               close(fd);
                printf("\tdevid %4llu size %s used %s path %s\n",
                        tmp_dev_info->devid,
                        pretty_size(tmp_dev_info->total_bytes),
@@ -392,6 +402,8 @@ static int print_one_fs(struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_info_args 
*fs_info,
                        tmp_dev_info->path);
        }
 
+       if (missing)
+               printf("\t*** Some devices missing\n");
        printf("\n");
        return 0;
 }
-- 
1.8.5.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to