On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:49:08 +0100 Goffredo Baroncelli <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for the comments, however I don't like du not usage; but you are right > when you don't like "disk-usage". What about "btrfs filesystem chunk-usage" ? Personally I don't see the point of being super-pedantic here, i.e. "look this is not just filesystem usage, this is filesystem CHUNK usage"... Consistency of having a matching "dev usage" and "fi usage" would have been nicer. -- With respect, Roman
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
