On 2014年03月03日 21:31, Liu Bo wrote:
It's unnecessary to update key's value, and remove it to keep code clean.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li....@oracle.com>
---
fs/btrfs/send.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/send.c b/fs/btrfs/send.c
index 3fe4d6e..a5f9626 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/send.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/send.c
@@ -5180,10 +5180,6 @@ static int full_send_tree(struct send_ctx *sctx)
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
- key.objectid = found_key.objectid;
- key.type = found_key.type;
- key.offset = found_key.offset + 1;
-
ret = btrfs_next_item(send_root, path);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
Hi Liu and all,
I think the statements may better be reserved. I noticed that there is
an "goto join_trans" above. I think we may hit it in the next round and
exec from the "join_trans" down, then these 3 assignments effect.
Sorry, I am not very sure whether this situation could happen, please
ignore me if I am making noise.
-H.A.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
