On 04/09/2014 12:51 PM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 11:46:13AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
Downloading the image now.  I'd just run a readonly btrfsck /dev/xxx

https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://marc.merlins.org/tmp/btrfs-raid0-image-fsck.txt&k=ZVNjlDMF0FElm4dQtryO4A%3D%3D%0A&r=6%2FL0lzzDhu0Y1hL9xm%2BQyA%3D%3D%0A&m=FvUwVb5mtQKfcHDJf0YzDhzyfAaFwrR9BXQbyCmT0No%3D%0A&s=633624e090ad2c187c1c5d62169bc0a8470ff2560049f83f195642638bff4b91
 (6MB)

I admit to not knowing how to read that output, I've only ever seen
thousands of lines of output from it on any filesystem., but hopefully you
know how to grep out expected noise.

But since we're talking about this, is btrfsck ever supposed to return clean
on a clean filesystem?

Looks like I'm getting different results from btrfsck on the image. Still a ton of corruptions but complaints about different blocks.

Can you please use btrfs-map-logical to dump both copies of block
245432320 and send me the results?

-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to