Hi list,

I've got a 3-device RAID1 btrfs filesystem that started out life as single-device.

btrfs fi df:

 Data, RAID1: total=1.31TiB, used=1.07TiB
 System, RAID1: total=32.00MiB, used=224.00KiB
 System, DUP: total=32.00MiB, used=32.00KiB
 System, single: total=4.00MiB, used=0.00
 Metadata, RAID1: total=66.00GiB, used=2.97GiB

This still lists some system chunks as DUP, and not as RAID1. Does this mean that if one device were to fail, some system chunks would be unrecoverable? How bad would that be?

Assuming this is something that needs to be fixed, would I be able to fix this by balancing the system chunks? Since the "force" flag is required, does that mean that balancing system chunks is inherently risky or unpleasant?

Thanks,

Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to