On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 02:37:16PM +0100, David Taylor wrote: > It makes more sense to me than 'Occupied' and seems cleaner than > 'Resized To'. It sort of mirrors how LVM describes PV / VG / LV > sizes, too.
Do you have a concrete example how we could map the btrfs sizes based on LVM? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
