On 05/30/2014 06:00 PM, Martin wrote:
OK... I'll jump in...

On 30/05/14 21:43, Josef Bacik wrote:
Hello,

TL;DR: I want to only do snapshot-aware defrag on inodes in snapshots
that haven't changed since the snapshot was taken.  Yay or nay (with a
reason why for nay)

[...]

=== Summary and what I need ===

Option 1: Only relink inodes that haven't changed since the snapshot was
taken.

Pros:
-Faster
-Simpler
-Less duplicated code, uses existing functions for tricky operations so
less likely to introduce weird bugs.

Cons:
-Could possibly lost some of the snapshot-awareness of the defrag.  If
you just touch a file we would not do the relinking and you'd end up
with twice the space usage.
[...]


Obvious way to go for fast KISS.


One question:

Will option one mean that we always need to mount with noatime or
read-only to allow snapshot defragging to do anything?


Yeah atime would screw this up, I hadn't thought of that. With that being the case I think the only option is to keep the old behavior, we don't want to screw up stuff like this just because users used a backup program on their snapshot and didn't use noatime. Thanks,

Josef

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to