Hi Filipe,
(2014/06/16 21:14), Filipe David Borba Manana wrote:
> The lock_wq wait queue is not used anywhere, therefore just remove it.
> On a x86_64 system, this reduced sizeof(struct extent_buffer) from 320
> bytes down to 296 bytes, which means a 4Kb page can now be used for
> 13 extent buffers instead of 12.
>
> Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <[email protected]>
It looks good to me. This field was once removed by bd681513.
However, re-introduced in error by 727011e07c
(both are Chris's patch).
I consider it's better to fix the following comment too.
===
$ cat -n fs/btrfs/extent_io.h | grep -B 3 write_lock_wq
152 /* readers use lock_wq while they wait for the write
153 * lock holders to unlock
154 */
155 wait_queue_head_t write_lock_wq;
===
We should "s/ lock_wq / write_lock_wq /" here.
Thanks,
Satoru
> ---
> fs/btrfs/extent_io.h | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
> index 8b63f2d..dbbea4f 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
> @@ -158,7 +158,6 @@ struct extent_buffer {
> * to unlock
> */
> wait_queue_head_t read_lock_wq;
> - wait_queue_head_t lock_wq;
> struct page *pages[INLINE_EXTENT_BUFFER_PAGES];
> #ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG
> struct list_head leak_list;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
