Hi Liu,

(2014/06/24 16:39), Liu Bo wrote:
> The reproducer is
> 
> $ mkfs.btrfs D1 D2 D3 -mraid5
> $ mkfs.ext4 D2 && mkfs.ext4 D3
> $ mount D1 /btrfs -odegraded

Tested-by: Satoru Takeuchi<[email protected]>

Here is the result of the last mount.

===
...
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/vdb1,
       missing codepage or helper program, or other error

       In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
       dmesg | tail or so.
===

It "correctly" failed :-)

Thanks,
Satoru

> 
> -------------------
> 
> [   87.672992] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [   87.673845] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/raid56.c:1828!
> ...
> [   87.673845] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff813efc7e>]  [<ffffffff813efc7e>] 
> __raid_recover_end_io+0x4ae/0x4d0
> ...
> [   87.673845] Call Trace:
> [   87.673845]  [<ffffffff8116bbc6>] ? mempool_free+0x36/0xa0
> [   87.673845]  [<ffffffff813f0255>] raid_recover_end_io+0x75/0xa0
> [   87.673845]  [<ffffffff81447c5b>] bio_endio+0x5b/0xa0
> [   87.673845]  [<ffffffff81447cb2>] bio_endio_nodec+0x12/0x20
> [   87.673845]  [<ffffffff81374621>] end_workqueue_fn+0x41/0x50
> [   87.673845]  [<ffffffff813ad2aa>] normal_work_helper+0xca/0x2c0
> [   87.673845]  [<ffffffff8108ba2b>] process_one_work+0x1eb/0x530
> [   87.673845]  [<ffffffff8108b9c9>] ? process_one_work+0x189/0x530
> [   87.673845]  [<ffffffff8108c15b>] worker_thread+0x11b/0x4f0
> [   87.673845]  [<ffffffff8108c040>] ? rescuer_thread+0x290/0x290
> [   87.673845]  [<ffffffff810939c4>] kthread+0xe4/0x100
> [   87.673845]  [<ffffffff810938e0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x220/0x220
> [   87.673845]  [<ffffffff817e7c7c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
> [   87.673845]  [<ffffffff810938e0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x220/0x220
> 
> -------------------
> 
> It's because that we miscalculate @rbio->bbio->error so that it doesn't
> reach maximum of tolerable errors while it should have.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <[email protected]>
> ---
>   fs/btrfs/raid56.c | 5 +++--
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/raid56.c b/fs/btrfs/raid56.c
> index 4055291..4a88f07 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/raid56.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/raid56.c
> @@ -1956,9 +1956,10 @@ static int __raid56_parity_recover(struct 
> btrfs_raid_bio *rbio)
>        * pages are going to be uptodate.
>        */
>       for (stripe = 0; stripe < bbio->num_stripes; stripe++) {
> -             if (rbio->faila == stripe ||
> -                 rbio->failb == stripe)
> +             if (rbio->faila == stripe || rbio->failb == stripe) {
> +                     atomic_inc(&rbio->bbio->error);
>                       continue;
> +             }
>   
>               for (pagenr = 0; pagenr < nr_pages; pagenr++) {
>                       struct page *p;
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to