(now used correct email id for Chris)
On 04/07/2014 19:21, Anand Jain wrote:
Miao, Chris,
I appreciate your review comments, Miao. I am sorry for the delay,
was stuck on this issue for a long time. more below.
On 02/07/2014 10:38, Miao Xie wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 23:06:54 +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
The primary reason of this problem is that we didn't scan the system
and
find all the devices in the filesystem, if we scan the system, we can
mount the filesystem successfully, needn't mount it with degraded
option.
so I think the right way to fix is to scan the system and find the
device
that is not registered into the fs device list.
Thanks for commenting. Right. But I am testing the error
scenario. that is, when one of the disk is missing in the system.
In fact, the disk is still in the system, but is not added into btrfs
device list
(we can add it by "btrfs device scan" command), and after you mount
the fs with
degraded option, the fs adds that disk as a missing device, so it
doesn't has its
name.
Correct.
Though avoiding access a null pointer is right,
yes. that would tightly plug the problem demonstrated in the reproducer
with minimal changes.
you didn't consider the missing
device and forgot to set the missing device counter. I think the
following code
is better.
if (orig_dev->missing) {
device->missing = 1;
fs_devices->missing_devices++;
} else {
ASSERT(orig_dev->name);
......
}
Yes we need to associate the device->missing flag and
device->name==NULL together, not just here but at quite a number of
functions. As such there is no code which would mark
device missing after its being mounted (there were some patch
but those are yet to be reviewed).
So for now this patch will address problem as in the reproducer.
BUT BUT it would enable sections of code (with new parameters) which
was _never_ run before due to this bug. That is in the following
scenario..
- A mounted (missing) degraded seed btrfs FS.
- Add a seed disk.
- For seeding purpose we would "clone a degraded seed FS".
(before this patch - the code will panic here so rest of the
code was never run).
I have very intermittent null pointer deference issue as the code
runs further, (with or without Miao suggested), more precisely at
btrfs_run_dev_stats()
::
list_for_each_entry(device, &fs_devices->devices, dev_list) the list
device is NULL.
looks like its time to comprehensively handle the missing device.
So as of now NACK for this patch. Very Sorry.
Thanks, Anand
Thanks
Miao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
