From: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_sat...@jp.fujitsu.com>

btrfs_lookup_csums_range() uses ALIGN() to check if "start"
and "end + 1" are aligned to "root->sectorsize". It's better to
replace these with IS_ALIGNED() for simplicity.

Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_sat...@jp.fujitsu.com>

---
 fs/btrfs/file-item.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
index f46cfe4..4b9e40f 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
@@ -329,8 +329,8 @@ int btrfs_lookup_csums_range(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 
start, u64 end,
        u64 csum_end;
        u16 csum_size = btrfs_super_csum_size(root->fs_info->super_copy);
 
-       ASSERT(start == ALIGN(start, root->sectorsize) &&
-              (end + 1) == ALIGN(end + 1, root->sectorsize));
+       ASSERT(IS_ALIGNED(start, root->sectorsize) &&
+              IS_ALIGNED(end + 1, root->sectorsize));
 
        path = btrfs_alloc_path();
        if (!path)
-- 
1.9.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to