(2014/08/12 17:30), Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
> From: Satoru Takeuchi <[email protected]>
> 
> Just fix the following misformatting in 'man btrfs-replace'.

Please ignore this patch.

It's part of the following Qu's patch.
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg36116.html

In addition, to make matters worse, I've reviewed and tested this patch ;-(

https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg36206.html

Satoru

> 
> ===============================================================================
> -f
>      force using and overwriting <targetdev> even if it looks like containing
>      a valid btrfs filesystem.
> 
>      A valid filesystem is assumed if a btrfs superblock is found which
>      contains a correct checksum. Devices which are currently mounted are 
> never
>      allowed to be used as the <targetdev>. -B:::: no background replace.
>                                             ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ===============================================================================
>   
> Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi <[email protected]>
> 
> ---
>   Documentation/btrfs-replace.txt | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/btrfs-replace.txt b/Documentation/btrfs-replace.txt
> index eecf9b0..476e351 100644
> --- a/Documentation/btrfs-replace.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/btrfs-replace.txt
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ containing a valid btrfs filesystem.
>   A valid filesystem is assumed if a btrfs superblock is found which contains 
> a
>   correct checksum. Devices which are currently mounted are
>   never allowed to be used as the <targetdev>.
> ++
>   -B::::
>   no background replace.
>   
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to