On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 01:36:12PM +0200, David Sterba wrote: > We've got a report of mismatched checksum and bisected to this patch. ... > But then I don't see the point of the patch, the code would just use a > bigger temprary buffer for no apparent reason, the outcom is the same.
Scatch that, the patch seems in line with what kernel does and there must be another reason of the mentioned bug. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
