I have a 240GB VirtualBox vdi image that is showing heavy fragmentation (filefrag). The file was created in a dir that was chattr +C'd, the file was created via fallocate and the contents of the orignal image were copied into the file via dd. I verified that the image was +C.
After initial creation there were about 2800 fragments, according to filefrag. That doesn't surprise me because this image took up about 60% of the free space. After an hour of light use the filefrag count was the same. But, after a day of heavy use, the count is now well over 600,000. There were no snapshots during the period of use. The fs does not have compression enabled. These usual suspects don't apply in my case. The process I used to copy the image to a noCOW image was: fallocate -n -l $(stat --format %s old.vdi) new.vdi dd if=old.vdi of=new.vdi conv=notrunc oflags=append bs=1M Performance does seem much worse in the VM but could it be that the image isn't actually severely fragmented and I'm just misunderstanding the output from filefrag? Is there a problem with how I copied over the old image file? --Larkin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
