Please ignore this patch, Chris has fixed this problem. Thanks Miao
On Mon, 1 Dec 2014 18:04:13 +0800, Miao Xie wrote: > If we failed to reading out the checksum, we would free all the checksums > in the list. But the current code accessed the list head, not the entry > in the list. Fix it. > > Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <[email protected]> > --- > fs/btrfs/file-item.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c > index 783a943..c26b58f 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c > @@ -413,7 +413,8 @@ int btrfs_lookup_csums_range(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 > start, u64 end, > ret = 0; > fail: > while (ret < 0 && !list_empty(&tmplist)) { > - sums = list_entry(&tmplist, struct btrfs_ordered_sum, list); > + sums = list_first_entry(&tmplist, struct btrfs_ordered_sum, > + list); > list_del(&sums->list); > kfree(sums); > } > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
