Am Montag, 29. Dezember 2014, 09:55:13 schrieb Ankur Tank:
> Thank you for reply Anand & Matrin,
> 
> Okay I understand the intention now.
> I know it's not the forum to address issues related to mkfs commands
> But I think, options used should be same across the mkfs.XXX commands.
> Another irregularity is
> mkfs.f2fs takes "-l" to apply label, while
> mkfs.ext4 take  "-L" to apply label.
> If one has to write a common script these cases has to be handled separately.
> 
> Anyways thank you for help,

Well, it is *one* of the forums. For that you probably need to CC every
filesystem development mailing list :) or as an alternative the common
fsdevel mailing list.

And yes, mkfs.reiserfs also takes -l. And the mkfs wrapper does *not* convert
the option. So if you use mkfs -t reiserfs -L it doesn´t work. That is why I
always use the mkfs.<FS> manpage and tool directly.

I think all mkfs tools should do the blkid check and not overwrite an
existing filesystem just so.

-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to