> On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Wang Shilong <wangshilong1...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>> btrfs_force_chunk_alloc() return 1 for allocation chunk successfully.
>> This problem exists since commit c87f08ca4.
>>
>> With this patch, we might fix some enospc problems for balances.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangshilong1...@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdman...@suse.com>
> Tested-by: Filipe Manana <fdman...@suse.com>

Thanks Filipe!

Regards,
Shilong

> 
>> ---
>>  fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
>> index d830853..c453464 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
>> @@ -4037,7 +4037,7 @@ restart:
>>         if (trans && progress && err == -ENOSPC) {
>>                 ret = btrfs_force_chunk_alloc(trans, rc->extent_root,
>>                                               rc->block_group->flags);
>> -               if (ret == 0) {
>> +               if (ret == 1) {
>>                         err = 0;
>>                         progress = 0;
>>                         goto restart;
>> --
>> 1.7.12.4
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
>> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to