Are either one of these called for? btrfs check --repair or btrfs check --repair --init-csum-tree
Seems like they might be a last ditch attempt. Is one preferred over the other? Is: btrfs rescue chunk-recover a much less dangerous attempt (IOW it wont hurt to try it first)? Thanks, Chris On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Sonic <sonicsm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Output of btrfs check: > > btrfs check /dev/sdc > warning, device 2 is missing > bytenr mismatch, want=20971520, have=0 > Couldn't read chunk root > Couldn't open file system > > btrfs check /dev/sde > checksum verify failed on 20971520 found 8B1D9672 wanted 2F8A4238 > checksum verify failed on 20971520 found 8B1D9672 wanted 2F8A4238 > bytenr mismatch, want=20971520, have=8330001001141004672 > Couldn't read chunk root > Couldn't open file system > > In case the above helps. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
