On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:33:38PM +0300, Timofey Titovets wrote: > Hello guys, > i like btrfs, and i want put it in production soon, > one of the feature that i want use, is a deduplication. > > i frequently testing duperemove on btrfs and already see this problem before. > i know what btrfs before, change mtime while deduping, but after dedup > fixes from Mark (https://github.com/markfasheh), i've try to get > checksums. > > As i know duperemove use kernel ioctl for deduping, i.e. it's not a > duperemove issue, kernel must keep data consistent. > > File system is fresh and btrfs check not show any metadata corruption. > > Github issue: > https://github.com/markfasheh/duperemove/issues/91 > > System info: > $ uname -a > Linux titovetst-beplan 4.2.0-rc8-next-20150825-0959-ARCH #1 SMP Wed > Aug 26 10:27:18 MSK 2015 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > Mount options: > rw,relatime,compress=lzo,space_cache,subvolid=257,subvol=/@home > > Okay, how i find it: > > md5sum_recursive(){ > find $@ -type f -exec md5sum {} \; > } > > cp -av --reflink=always ~/<src> ~/<dest> > md5sum_recursive ~/<dest> > ~/dedup.before > duperemove -vhrdb 8k ~/<dest> > md5sum_recursive ~/<dest> > ~/dedup.after > diff -up ~/dedup.before ~/dedup.after > > what i've got (full diff in attach): > --- /home/nefelim4ag/dedup.after 2015-08-26 21:36:55.773452558 +0300 > +++ /home/nefelim4ag/dedup.before 2015-08-26 21:21:01.203600761 +0300 > @@ -25139,9 +25139,9 @@ caf9d41036e46b85d90a9541e8bc9ce1 /home/ > .... > -0ccbc9c81a51f59dcf2ac0d102de37cb > /home/nefelim4ag/L4D2/left4dead2/pak01_003.vpk > +e665b502ee977dc1c619ecbd415c91b8 > /home/nefelim4ag/L4D2/left4dead2/pak01_000.vpk > ....
Note that these are two different files, and would therefore be expected to have different checksums. My guess would be that the order of enumeration for the find is different in some way, and you should sort the output before comparing it. Hugo. > Files sizes not changed and it's > 1MB. > > Every time i've get a random data corruption. > Only dependencies what i've find it is what smallest block -> more > corruptions and vise versa, i.e. more data deduped -> more corrupted. > > Smart of the disk, it's not looks, like damaged. (attach) > > What i can provide to help fix this issue? > If it's needed, i can recompile kernel with some parameters if it can > help, of course. -- Hugo Mills | Something must be done! hugo@... carfax.org.uk | This is something. http://carfax.org.uk/ | Therefore we will do it! PGP: E2AB1DE4 | Management syllogism
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
