Qu,
We shouldn't mark FS readonly when chunks are degradable.
As below.
Thanks, Anand
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index 39a2d57..dbb2483 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -3530,7 +3530,7 @@ static int write_all_supers(struct btrfs_root
*root, int max_mirrors)
if (do_barriers) {
ret = barrier_all_devices(root->fs_info);
- if (ret) {
+ if (ret < 0) {
mutex_unlock(
&root->fs_info->fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
btrfs_std_error(root->fs_info, ret,
On 09/21/2015 10:10 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
The last user of num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures is
barrier_all_devices().
But it's can be easily changed to new per-chunk degradable check
framework.
Now btrfs_device will have two extra members, representing send/wait
error, set at write_dev_flush() time.
And then check it in a similar but more accurate behavior than old code.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 13 +++++--------
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 6 +++++-
fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 4 ++++
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index d64299f..7cd94e7 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -3400,8 +3400,6 @@ static int barrier_all_devices(struct btrfs_fs_info *info)
{
struct list_head *head;
struct btrfs_device *dev;
- int errors_send = 0;
- int errors_wait = 0;
int ret;
/* send down all the barriers */
@@ -3410,7 +3408,7 @@ static int barrier_all_devices(struct btrfs_fs_info *info)
if (dev->missing)
continue;
if (!dev->bdev) {
- errors_send++;
+ dev->err_send = 1;
continue;
}
if (!dev->in_fs_metadata || !dev->writeable)
@@ -3418,7 +3416,7 @@ static int barrier_all_devices(struct btrfs_fs_info *info)
ret = write_dev_flush(dev, 0);
if (ret)
- errors_send++;
+ dev->err_send = 1;
}
/* wait for all the barriers */
@@ -3426,7 +3424,7 @@ static int barrier_all_devices(struct btrfs_fs_info *info)
if (dev->missing)
continue;
if (!dev->bdev) {
- errors_wait++;
+ dev->err_wait = 1;
continue;
}
if (!dev->in_fs_metadata || !dev->writeable)
@@ -3434,10 +3432,9 @@ static int barrier_all_devices(struct btrfs_fs_info
*info)
ret = write_dev_flush(dev, 1);
if (ret)
- errors_wait++;
+ dev->err_wait = 1;
}
- if (errors_send > info->num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures ||
- errors_wait > info->num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures)
+ if (btrfs_check_degradable(info, info->sb->s_flags) < 0)
return -EIO;
return 0;
}
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index f1ef215..88266fa 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -6945,8 +6945,12 @@ int btrfs_check_degradable(struct btrfs_fs_info
*fs_info, unsigned flags)
btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures(
map->type);
for (i = 0; i < map->num_stripes; i++) {
- if (map->stripes[i].dev->missing)
+ if (map->stripes[i].dev->missing ||
+ map->stripes[i].dev->err_wait ||
+ map->stripes[i].dev->err_send)
missing++;
+ map->stripes[i].dev->err_wait = 0;
+ map->stripes[i].dev->err_send = 0;
}
if (missing > max_tolerated) {
ret = -EIO;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
index fe758df..cd02556 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
@@ -76,6 +76,10 @@ struct btrfs_device {
int can_discard;
int is_tgtdev_for_dev_replace;
+ /* for barrier_all_devices() check */
+ int err_send;
+ int err_wait;
+
#ifdef __BTRFS_NEED_DEVICE_DATA_ORDERED
seqcount_t data_seqcount;
#endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
