I've accidentally picked an already used number for the enhanced usage
filter represented by BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_USAGE_RANGE, clashing with
BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_CONVERT. Introduced during the development phase,
no backward compatibility issues.

Reported-by: Holger Hoffstätte <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
Fixes: bc3094673f22 ("btrfs: extend balance filter usage to take minimum and 
maximum")
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
---

For 4.4-rc

 fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
index ec5712372732..d5c84f6b1353 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ struct map_lookup {
 #define BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_LIMIT       (1ULL << 5)
 #define BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_LIMIT_RANGE (1ULL << 6)
 #define BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_STRIPES_RANGE (1ULL << 7)
-#define BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_USAGE_RANGE (1ULL << 8)
+#define BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_USAGE_RANGE (1ULL << 10)
 
 #define BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_MASK                        \
        (BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_PROFILES |          \
-- 
2.6.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to