On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Liu Bo <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 05:25:18PM +0000, [email protected] wrote: >> From: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> >> >> Commit 61de718fceb6 ("Btrfs: fix memory corruption on failure to submit >> bio for direct IO") fixed problems with the error handling code after we >> fail to submit a bio for direct IO. However there were 2 problems that it >> did not address when the failure is due to memory allocation failures for >> direct IO writes: >> >> 1) We considered that there could be only one ordered extent for the whole >> IO range, which is not always true, as we can have multiple; >> >> 2) It did not set the bit BTRFS_ORDERED_IO_DONE in the ordered extent, >> which can make other tasks running btrfs_wait_logged_extents() hang >> forever, since they wait for that bit to be set. The general assumption >> is that regardless of an error, the BTRFS_ORDERED_IO_DONE is always set >> and it precedes setting the bit BTRFS_ORDERED_COMPLETE. >> >> Fix these issues by moving part of the btrfs_endio_direct_write() handler >> into a new helper function and having that new helper function called when >> we fail to allocate memory to submit the bio (and its private object) for >> a direct IO write. >> >> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> >> --- >> fs/btrfs/inode.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- >> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c >> index f82d1f4..4f8560c 100644 >> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c >> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c >> @@ -7995,22 +7995,22 @@ static void btrfs_endio_direct_read(struct bio *bio) >> bio_put(bio); >> } >> >> -static void btrfs_endio_direct_write(struct bio *bio) >> +static void btrfs_endio_direct_write_update_ordered(struct inode *inode, >> + const u64 offset, >> + const u64 bytes, >> + const int uptodate) >> { >> - struct btrfs_dio_private *dip = bio->bi_private; >> - struct inode *inode = dip->inode; >> struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(inode)->root; >> struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered = NULL; >> - u64 ordered_offset = dip->logical_offset; >> - u64 ordered_bytes = dip->bytes; >> - struct bio *dio_bio; >> + u64 ordered_offset = offset; >> + u64 ordered_bytes = bytes; >> int ret; >> >> again: >> ret = btrfs_dec_test_first_ordered_pending(inode, &ordered, >> &ordered_offset, >> ordered_bytes, >> - !bio->bi_error); >> + uptodate); >> if (!ret) >> goto out_test; >> >> @@ -8023,13 +8023,22 @@ out_test: >> * our bio might span multiple ordered extents. If we haven't >> * completed the accounting for the whole dio, go back and try again >> */ >> - if (ordered_offset < dip->logical_offset + dip->bytes) { >> - ordered_bytes = dip->logical_offset + dip->bytes - >> - ordered_offset; >> + if (ordered_offset < offset + bytes) { >> + ordered_bytes = offset + bytes - ordered_offset; >> ordered = NULL; >> goto again; >> } >> - dio_bio = dip->dio_bio; >> +} >> + >> +static void btrfs_endio_direct_write(struct bio *bio) >> +{ >> + struct btrfs_dio_private *dip = bio->bi_private; >> + struct bio *dio_bio = dip->dio_bio; >> + >> + btrfs_endio_direct_write_update_ordered(dip->inode, >> + dip->logical_offset, >> + dip->bytes, >> + !bio->bi_error); >> >> kfree(dip); >> >> @@ -8365,24 +8374,15 @@ free_ordered: >> dip = NULL; >> io_bio = NULL; >> } else { >> - if (write) { >> - struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered; >> - >> - ordered = btrfs_lookup_ordered_extent(inode, >> - file_offset); >> - set_bit(BTRFS_ORDERED_IOERR, &ordered->flags); >> - /* >> - * Decrements our ref on the ordered extent and removes >> - * the ordered extent from the inode's ordered tree, >> - * doing all the proper resource cleanup such as for >> the >> - * reserved space and waking up any waiters for this >> - * ordered extent (through >> btrfs_remove_ordered_extent). >> - */ >> - btrfs_finish_ordered_io(ordered); >> - } else { >> + if (write) >> + btrfs_endio_direct_write_update_ordered(inode, >> + file_offset, >> + dio_bio->bi_iter.bi_size, >> + 1); > > uptodate=1 won't set IOERR for ordered extent, is that expected?
Indeed, wrong value due to inverted logic from a local earlier version I had. Thanks. > > Thanks, > > -liubo >> + else >> unlock_extent(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, file_offset, >> file_offset + dio_bio->bi_iter.bi_size - 1); >> - } >> + >> dio_bio->bi_error = -EIO; >> /* >> * Releases and cleans up our dio_bio, no need to bio_put() >> -- >> 2.1.3 >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in >> the body of a message to [email protected] >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
