On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 08:25:47PM +0100, Christian Völker wrote: > Hi Guys, > > sorry for the simple question and I assume every developer here laughs > about this question. > > Anyway: > > I have read loads of documents but did not find an answer for sure. Even > though I assume I am right. > > On a btrfs filesystem created; is it possible to have subvolumes with > data duplication and another subvolume without (resp. with just metadata > duplication)?
No. It may happen at some point, but it's not possible right now. Hugo. > I have some large filesystems currently with ext4 and I am thinking of > changing to btrfs. Some of the data is more important than others. So I > want to have data duplication on the important files (sorted in a mount > point) and without for the other subvolume. > > So I want to have the advantage of redundancy of important files > combined with the flexibility of the volume manager and shared disk space. > > Possible? > > > GReetings > > Christian > -- Hugo Mills | "I don't like the look of it, I tell you." hugo@... carfax.org.uk | "Well, stop looking at it, then." http://carfax.org.uk/ | PGP: E2AB1DE4 | The Goons
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
