On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:29:29AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > > David Sterba wrote on 2015/04/17 19:29 +0200: > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 09:19:11AM +0000, Hugo Mills wrote: > >>> In, some article i read that future there will be more chunk tree/ extent > >>> tree for single btrfs. Is this true. > >> > >> I recall, many moons ago, Chris saying that there probably wouldn't > >> be. > > > > More extent trees tied to a set of fs trees/subvolumes would be very > > useful for certain usecases *cough*encryption*cough*. > > BTW, will such design makes reflink between different set of extents > fallback to normal copy?
Yes, the actual reflink will not be possible. > And I'm pretty sure that inband dedup will be affected too... Yes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
