On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 8:14 PM, Henk Slager <eye...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Marc Haber > <mh+linux-bt...@zugschlus.de> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 12:34:09PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: >>> The alternative if this can't be fixed, is to recreate the filesystem >>> because there's no practical way yet to migrate so many snapshots to a >>> new file system. >> >> I recreated the file system on March 7, with 200 GiB in size, using >> btrfs-tools 4.4. The snapshot-taking process has been running since >> then, but I also regularly cleaned up. The number of snapshots on the >> new filesystem has never exceeded 1000, with the current count being >> at 148. > > Is the snapshotting still read-write? > You mentioned earlier that you treated the snapshots as read-only, so > maybe create them also as read-only, in an attempt to mitigate the > problem of growing metadata and enospc issues.
Sorry, I mixed it up with another thread; Forget about the question. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
