Pete posted on Fri, 18 Mar 2016 18:16:50 +0000 as excerpted:

> On 03/18/2016 09:17 AM, Duncan wrote:

>> So btrfs raid1 has data integrity and repair features that aren't
>> available on normal raid1, and thus is highly recommended.
>> 
>> But, raid1 /does/ mean two copies of both data and metadata (assuming
>> of course you make them both raid1, as I did), and if you simply don't
>> have room to do it that way, you don't have room, highly recommended
>> tho it may be.
> 
> This looks like a strong recommendation to get a second SSD for the root
> partition and go raid1.  Are SSDs more flakey that hdd or are you just a
> strong believer in the integrity of raid1?

As Austin says, I'd generally consider ssds /more/ reliable than hdds, at 
least as long as you stay away from the OCZs, etc (but then again, there 
are spinning rust brands and specific models I stay away from, as well), 
but the failure modes are a bit different so it's not always as simple as 
that.

But I played with raid1 before btrfs and find the additional data 
integrity features that btrfs raid1 brings even more compelling, so yes, 
it would indeed be fair to say that I'm a strong booster of btrfs raid1 
in particular. =:^)

The roadmapped but still to come feature I'm /really/ looking forward to, 
however, is N-way-mirroring, because btrfs raid1 is currently very 
specifically two copies, regardless of how many devices there are, and I 
would really /really/ like to have the choice of three copies, again, not 
just for device-failure protection, but because with btrfs checksumming 
and data integrity, if one copy is found to be bad for whatever reason, 
be it a crash before all copies were written, or a failing device, a 
simple bad block on an otherwise fine device, or whatever gamma ray block 
damage or the like, right now that means the other copy BETTER come out 
checksum-verified, or that data or metadata is toast, and I'd rest far 
easier if even if one failed, I knew there was still not just the one 
copy, but a second, to fall back on as well.

With N-way-mirroring, of course that could be 4 or more copies as well, 
but three is closest to my sweet spot balance between cost and extreme 
reliability, and I'd very much like to have that choice as an option.

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to