On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:16:46AM -0700, Davide Italiano wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Davide Italiano <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 7:08 AM, David Sterba <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 10:09:15PM -0700, Davide Italiano wrote: > >>> - We call inode_size_ok() only if FL_KEEP_SIZE isn't specified. > >>> - As an optimisation we can skip the call if (off + len) > >>> isn't greater than the current size of the file. This operation > >>> is called under the lock so the less work we do, the better. > >>> - If we call inode_size_ok() pass to it the correct value rather > >>> than a more conservative estimation. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Davide Italiano <[email protected]> > >> > >> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> > > > > Hi Chris, this has been around for a while and it's been reviewed by > > multiple people. Any chances you can pull in your branch?
I'm adding this patch to my for-next, sorry for late response. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
