On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:15:51PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> From: Qu Wenruo <quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com>
> 
> Introduce a new function, btrfs_check_degradable(), to judge if all chunks
> in btrfs is OK for degraded mount.
> 
> It provides the new basis for accurate btrfs mount/remount and even
> runtime degraded mount check other than old one-size-fit-all method.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 63 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  fs/btrfs/volumes.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 64 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index 9d72dabdddfc..a351c5dd9e9b 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -7039,3 +7039,66 @@ static void btrfs_close_one_device(struct btrfs_device 
> *device)
>  
>       call_rcu(&device->rcu, free_device);
>  }
> +
> +/*
> + * Check if all chunks in the fs is OK for degraded mount
> + * Caller itself should do extra check if DEGRADED mount option is given
> + * for >0 return value.
> + *
> + * Return 0 if all chunks are OK.
> + * Return >0 if all chunks are degradable but not all OK.
> + * Return <0 if any chunk is not degradable or other bug.
> + */
> +int btrfs_check_degradable(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, unsigned flags)
> +{
> +     struct btrfs_mapping_tree *map_tree = &fs_info->mapping_tree;
> +     struct extent_map *em;
> +     u64 next_start = 0;
> +     int ret = 0;
> +
> +     if (flags & MS_RDONLY)
> +             return 0;
> +
> +     read_lock(&map_tree->map_tree.lock);
> +     em = lookup_extent_mapping(&map_tree->map_tree, 0, (u64)(-1));
> +     /* No any chunk? Should be a huge bug */
> +     if (!em) {
> +             ret = -ENOENT;
> +             goto out;
> +     }
> +
> +     while (em) {
> +             struct map_lookup *map;
> +             int missing = 0;
> +             int max_tolerated;
> +             int i;
> +
> +             map = (struct map_lookup *) em->bdev;
> +             max_tolerated =
> +                     btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures(
> +                                     map->type);
> +             for (i = 0; i < map->num_stripes; i++) {
> +                     if (map->stripes[i].dev->missing)
> +                             missing++;
> +             }
> +             if (missing > max_tolerated) {
> +                     ret = -EIO;
> +                     btrfs_warn(fs_info,
> +                                "missing devices(%d) exceeds the limit(%d), 
> writebale mount is not allowed",
> +                                missing, max_tolerated);

Typo: s/writebale/writeable/


-- 
Yauhen Kharuzhy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to