From: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>

THIS PATCH IS FOR TESTING ONLY AND NOT MEANT TO HIT LINUS TREE

It is desirable to reduce the direct GFP_NO{FS,IO} usage at minimum and
prefer scope usage defined by memalloc_no{fs,io}_{save,restore} API.

Let's help this process and add a debugging tool to catch when an
explicit allocation request for GFP_NO{FS,IO} is done from the scope
context. The printed stacktrace should help to identify the caller
and evaluate whether it can be changed to use a wider context or whether
it is called from another potentially dangerous context which needs
a scope protection as well.

The checks have to be enabled explicitly by debug_scope_gfp kernel
command line parameter.

Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>
---
 mm/page_alloc.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 86bb5d6ddd7d..085d00280496 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -3750,6 +3750,61 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int 
order,
        return page;
 }
 
+static bool debug_scope_gfp;
+
+static int __init enable_debug_scope_gfp(char *unused)
+{
+       debug_scope_gfp = true;
+       return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * spit the stack trace if the given gfp_mask clears flags which are context
+ * wide cleared. Such a caller can remove special flags clearing and rely on
+ * the context wide mask.
+ */
+static inline void debug_scope_gfp_context(gfp_t gfp_mask)
+{
+       gfp_t restrict_mask;
+
+       if (likely(!debug_scope_gfp))
+               return;
+
+       /* both NOFS, NOIO are irrelevant when direct reclaim is disabled */
+       if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM))
+               return;
+
+       if (current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO)
+               restrict_mask = __GFP_IO;
+       else if ((current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS) && (gfp_mask & __GFP_IO))
+               restrict_mask = __GFP_FS;
+       else
+               return;
+
+       if ((gfp_mask & restrict_mask) != restrict_mask) {
+               /*
+                * If you see this this warning then the code does:
+                * memalloc_no{fs,io}_save()
+                * ...
+                *    foo()
+                *      alloc_page(GFP_NO{FS,IO})
+                * ...
+                * memalloc_no{fs,io}_restore()
+                *
+                * allocation which is unnecessary because the scope gfp
+                * context will do that for all allocation requests already.
+                * If foo() is called from multiple contexts then make sure 
other
+                * contexts are safe wrt. GFP_NO{FS,IO} semantic and either add
+                * scope protection into particular paths or change the gfp mask
+                * to GFP_KERNEL.
+                */
+               pr_info("Unnecesarily specific gfp mask:%#x(%pGg) for the %s 
task wide context\n", gfp_mask, &gfp_mask,
+                               (current->flags & 
PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO)?"NOIO":"NOFS");
+               dump_stack();
+       }
+}
+early_param("debug_scope_gfp", enable_debug_scope_gfp);
+
 /*
  * This is the 'heart' of the zoned buddy allocator.
  */
@@ -3796,6 +3851,7 @@ __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
                                ac.nodemask);
 
        /* First allocation attempt */
+       debug_scope_gfp_context(gfp_mask);
        page = get_page_from_freelist(alloc_mask, order, alloc_flags, &ac);
        if (likely(page))
                goto out;
-- 
2.8.0.rc3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to