On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 07:31:48PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 06:24:10PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> > Yauhen reported in the ML that s_bdev is null at mount, and
> > s_bdev gets updated to some device when missing device is
> > replaced, as because bdev is null for missing device, things
> > gets matched up. Fix this by checking if s_bdev is set. I
> > didn't want to completely remove updating s_bdev because
> > the future multi device support at vfs layer may need it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.j...@oracle.com>
> > Reported-by: Yauhen Kharuzhy <yauhen.kharu...@zavadatar.com>
>
> Do you have a testcase for that? As there are more patches touching the
> device pointers I'd rather see some test coverage. Thanks.
Testcase is ('global spare' patchset is needed for device closing
support):
1) create RAID, mount -> s_bdev is NULL
2) replace latest device by another -> s_bdev is bdev of new drive
3) remove drive added by replace
4) touch mountpount and do btrfs fi sync (device will be closed and
marked as missing here) -> s_bdev is invalid pointer to closed and freed
bdev
5) unmount FS -> oops
Something like:
mkfs.btrfs -d raid5 -m raid5 <dev1> <dev2>... <devN-1>
mount <dev1> /mnt
btrfs replace start -B <devN-1> <devN> /mnt
_devmgt_remove <devN> # _devmgt_remove is helper for detaching scsi device
touch /mnt
btrfs fi sync /mnt
umount /mnt
I will try to make xfstest scripts for this case and for other cases
reported by me.
--
Yauhen Kharuzhy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
