On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 09:59:38AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 05:37:40PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > Using the offwakecputime bpf script I noticed most of our time was spent 
> > waiting
> > on the delayed ref throttling.  This is what is supposed to happen, but
> > sometimes the transaction can commit and then we're waiting for throttling 
> > that
> > doesn't matter anymore.  So change this stuff to be a little smarter by 
> > tracking
> > the transid we were in when we initiated the throttling.  If the 
> > transaction we
> > get is different then we can just bail out.  This resulted in a 50% speedup 
> > in
> > my fs_mark test, and reduced the amount of time spent throttling by 60 
> > seconds
> > over the entire run (which is about 30 minutes).  Thanks,
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jba...@fb.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/btrfs/ctree.h       |  2 +-
> >  fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> >  fs/btrfs/inode.c       |  1 +
> >  fs/btrfs/transaction.c |  3 ++-
> >  4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> > index 55a24c5..4222936 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> > @@ -3505,7 +3505,7 @@ void btrfs_put_block_group(struct 
> > btrfs_block_group_cache *cache);
> >  int btrfs_run_delayed_refs(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> >                        struct btrfs_root *root, unsigned long count);
> >  int btrfs_async_run_delayed_refs(struct btrfs_root *root,
> > -                            unsigned long count, int wait);
> > +                            unsigned long count, u64 transid, int wait);
> >  int btrfs_lookup_data_extent(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 start, u64 len);
> >  int btrfs_lookup_extent_info(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> >                          struct btrfs_root *root, u64 bytenr,
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> > index 4b5a517..f23f426 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> > @@ -2839,6 +2839,7 @@ int btrfs_should_throttle_delayed_refs(struct 
> > btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> >  
> >  struct async_delayed_refs {
> >     struct btrfs_root *root;
> > +   u64 transid;
> >     int count;
> >     int error;
> >     int sync;
> > @@ -2854,9 +2855,16 @@ static void delayed_ref_async_start(struct 
> > btrfs_work *work)
> >  
> >     async = container_of(work, struct async_delayed_refs, work);
> >  
> > -   trans = btrfs_join_transaction(async->root);
> > +   trans = btrfs_attach_transaction(async->root);
> >     if (IS_ERR(trans)) {
> > -           async->error = PTR_ERR(trans);
> > +           if (PTR_ERR(trans) != -ENOENT)
> > +                   async->error = PTR_ERR(trans);
> > +           goto done;
> > +   }
> 
> This ends up deadlocking because btrfs_attach_transaction waits in ways
> that join does not.  The differences between these two are really
> subtle, and we manage to make this mistake every year or so.
> 
> Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: fix deadlock in delayed_ref_async_start
> 
> "Btrfs: track transid for delayed ref flushing" was deadlocking on
> btrfs_attach_transaction because its not safe to call from the async
> delayed ref start code.  This commit brings back btrfs_join_transaction
> instead and checks for a blocked commit.

Are we going to take this patch?

Thanks,

-liubo

> 
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jba...@fb.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <c...@fb.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> index 6ce5b6c..44da4ac 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> @@ -2845,16 +2845,13 @@ static void delayed_ref_async_start(struct btrfs_work 
> *work)
>  
>       async = container_of(work, struct async_delayed_refs, work);
>  
> -     trans = btrfs_attach_transaction(async->root);
> -     if (IS_ERR(trans)) {
> -             if (PTR_ERR(trans) != -ENOENT)
> -                     async->error = PTR_ERR(trans);
> +     /* if the commit is already started, we don't need to wait here */
> +     if (btrfs_transaction_blocked(async->root->fs_info))
>               goto done;
> -     }
>  
> -     /* Don't bother flushing if we got into a different transaction */
> -     if (trans->transid != async->transid) {
> -             btrfs_end_transaction(trans, async->root);
> +     trans = btrfs_join_transaction(async->root);
> +     if (IS_ERR(trans)) {
> +             async->error = PTR_ERR(trans);
>               goto done;
>       }
>  
> @@ -2863,10 +2860,15 @@ static void delayed_ref_async_start(struct btrfs_work 
> *work)
>        * wait on delayed refs
>        */
>       trans->sync = true;
> +
> +     /* Don't bother flushing if we got into a different transaction */
> +     if (trans->transid > async->transid)
> +             goto end;
> +
>       ret = btrfs_run_delayed_refs(trans, async->root, async->count);
>       if (ret)
>               async->error = ret;
> -
> +end:
>       ret = btrfs_end_transaction(trans, async->root);
>       if (ret && !async->error)
>               async->error = ret;
> -- 
> 2.8.0.rc2
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to