On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 09:44:03AM +0800, robbieko wrote:
> From: Robbie Ko <robbi...@synology.com>
> 
> Test that an incremental send operation doesn't work because
> there's a name collision in the destination and it's not checked
> corretly before the rename operation applies.
> 
> This test exercises scenarios used to fail in btrfs and are fixed by
> the following patch for the linux kernel:
> 
> "Btrfs: incremental send, do not skip generation inconsistency check for 
> inode 256."
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbi...@synology.com>

Sorry for the late review!

> ---
>  tests/btrfs/131     | 111 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/btrfs/131.out |   2 +
>  tests/btrfs/group   |   1 +
>  3 files changed, 114 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100755 tests/btrfs/131
>  create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/131.out
> 
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/131 b/tests/btrfs/131
> new file mode 100755
> index 0000000..2e2e0bc
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/131
> @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# FS QA Test No. btrfs/131
> +#
> +# Test that an incremental send operation doesn't work because
> +# there's a name collision in the destination and it's not checked
> +# corretly before the rename operation applies.
> +#
> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +# Copyright (C) 2016 Synology Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> +# Author: Robbie Ko <robbi...@synology.com>
> +#
> +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> +# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> +# published by the Free Software Foundation.
> +#
> +# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful,
> +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> +# GNU General Public License for more details.
> +#
> +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> +# along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation,
> +# Inc.,  51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA  02110-1301  USA
> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +#
> +
> +seq=`basename $0`
> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> +
> +tmp=/tmp/$$
> +status=1     # failure is the default!
> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> +
> +_cleanup()
> +{
> +     cd /
> +     rm -fr $send_files_dir
> +     rm -f $tmp.*
> +}
> +
> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> +. ./common/rc
> +. ./common/filter
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +_supported_fs btrfs
> +_supported_os Linux
> +_require_test
> +_require_scratch
> +_require_fssum
> +
> +send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq
> +
> +rm -f $seqres.full
> +rm -fr $send_files_dir
> +mkdir $send_files_dir
> +
> +_scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
> +_scratch_mount
> +
> +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/a1
> +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/a2
> +
> +# Filesystem looks like:
> +#
> +# .                                                             (ino 256)
> +# |--- a1/                                                      (ino 257)
> +# |
> +# |--- a2/                                                      (ino 258)
> +#
> +_run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1
> +
> +_run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 -f $send_files_dir/1.snap

I found these "run_check" based helpers make the result harder to read
when test failed, I can't see immediate error messages from the diff
output but have to open $seqres.full file to see the details.

Can you please use $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG directly, in all these four tests?
One concern about using bare $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG is that output messages of
btrfs command are always changed. But I think, at least, we can ignore
the stdout and capture the stderr only. e.g.

$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \
        $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 >/dev/null

So if everything works fine no output can be seen, but if snapshot
creation is failed, we can see error messages from stderr, which could
fail the test.

> +
> +_scratch_unmount
> +_scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
> +_scratch_mount
> +touch $SCRATCH_MNT/a2
> +
> +# Filesystem now looks like:
> +#
> +# .                                                             (ino 256)
> +# |--- a2                                                       (ino 257)
> +#
> +_run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2
> +
> +_run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap
> +rm $send_files_dir/1.snap
> +
> +run_check $FSSUM_PROG -A -f -w $send_files_dir/1.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1
> +run_check $FSSUM_PROG -A -f -w $send_files_dir/2.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2

And this "run_check" is not necessary either. Just run $FSSUM_PROG
directly and let it print "OK", and match it in .out file.

Thanks,
Eryu

> +
> +_run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 -f $send_files_dir/1.snap
> +_run_btrfs_util_prog send -p $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 \
> +     -f $send_files_dir/2.snap
> +
> +# Now recreate the filesystem by receiving both send streams and verify we 
> get
> +# the same content that the original filesystem had.
> +_scratch_unmount
> +_scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
> +_scratch_mount
> +
> +_run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap
> +run_check $FSSUM_PROG -r $send_files_dir/1.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1
> +_run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/2.snap
> +run_check $FSSUM_PROG -r $send_files_dir/2.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2
> +
> +echo "Silence is golden"
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/131.out b/tests/btrfs/131.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..d118ca9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/131.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +QA output created by 131
> +Silence is golden
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/group b/tests/btrfs/group
> index f3a7a4f..a7a070a 100644
> --- a/tests/btrfs/group
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/group
> @@ -133,3 +133,4 @@
>  128 auto quick send
>  129 auto quick send
>  130 auto clone send
> +131 auto quick send
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to