On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 01:34:49PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 10:14:49PM +0000, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> > > > Basically gcc tries to say us BUILD_ASSERT is not visible.
> > > > 
> > > > BUILD_ASSERT lives in kerncompat.h which this change adds.  
> > > 
> > > I think including the kerncompat.h is too intrusive here, I've fixed by
> > > providing an empty macro if it's not defined. I'll release 4.8.2 soon.
> > 
> > Apologies. I did not test your fix right afterwards. Seems now header is 
> > incomplete
> > due to missing NULL (gcc-6):
> > 
> > btrfs-progs-v4.8.3 $ gcc -c ioctl.h -o /tmp/a.o
> > ioctl.h: In function 'btrfs_err_str':
> > ioctl.h:711:11: error: 'NULL' undeclared (first use in this function)
> >     return NULL;
> >            ^~~~
> > ioctl.h:711:11: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for 
> > each function it appears in
> 
> The ioctl.h file can be included in both C and C++ code, I'd rahter
> avoid to ifdef the right definition of NULL, so s/NULL/0/ seems as a
> best fix to me.

Or #include <stddef.h>, now committed to devel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to