Am Mittwoch, 16. November 2016, 15:43:36 CET schrieb Roman Mamedov:
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 11:25:00 +0100
>
> Martin Steigerwald <martin.steigerw...@teamix.de> wrote:
> > merkaba:~> mount -o degraded,clear_cache /dev/satafp1/backup /mnt/zeit
> > mount: Falscher Dateisystemtyp, ungültige Optionen, der
> > Superblock von /dev/mapper/satafp1-backup ist beschädigt, fehlende
> > Kodierungsseite oder ein anderer Fehler
> >
> > Manchmal liefert das Systemprotokoll wertvolle Informationen –
> > versuchen Sie dmesg | tail oder ähnlich
> >
> > merkaba:~#32> dmesg | tail -6
> > [ 3080.120687] BTRFS info (device dm-13): allowing degraded mounts
> > [ 3080.120699] BTRFS info (device dm-13): force clearing of disk cache
> > [ 3080.120703] BTRFS info (device dm-13): disk space caching is
> > enabled
> > [ 3080.120706] BTRFS info (device dm-13): has skinny extents
> > [ 3080.150957] BTRFS warning (device dm-13): missing devices (1)
> > exceeds the limit (0), writeable mount is not allowed
> > [ 3080.195941] BTRFS: open_ctree failed
>
> I have to wonder did you read the above message? What you need at this point
> is simply "-o degraded,ro". But I don't see that tried anywhere down the
> line.
>
> See also (or try): https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9419189/
Actually I read that one, but I read more into it than what it was saying:
I read into it that BTRFS would automatically use a read only mount.
merkaba:~> mount -o degraded,ro /dev/satafp1/daten /mnt/zeit
actually really works. *Thank you*, Roman.
I do think that above kernel messages invite such a kind of interpretation
tough. I took the "BTRFS: open_ctree failed" message as indicative to some
structural issue with the filesystem.
So mounting work although for some reason scrubbing is aborted (I had this
issue a long time ago on my laptop as well). After removing /var/lib/btrfs
scrub status file for the filesystem:
merkaba:~> btrfs scrub start /mnt/zeit
scrub started on /mnt/zeit, fsid […] (pid=9054)
merkaba:~> btrfs scrub status /mnt/zeit
scrub status for […]
scrub started at Wed Nov 16 11:52:56 2016 and was aborted after
00:00:00
total bytes scrubbed: 0.00B with 0 errors
Anyway, I will now just rsync off the files.
Interestingly enough btrfs restore complained about looping over certain
files… lets see whether the rsync or btrfs send/receive proceeds through.
Ciao,
--
Martin Steigerwald | Trainer
teamix GmbH
Südwestpark 43
90449 Nürnberg
Tel.: +49 911 30999 55 | Fax: +49 911 30999 99
mail: martin.steigerw...@teamix.de | web: http://www.teamix.de | blog:
http://blog.teamix.de
Amtsgericht Nürnberg, HRB 18320 | Geschäftsführer: Oliver Kügow, Richard Müller
teamix Support Hotline: +49 911 30999-112
*** Bitte liken Sie uns auf Facebook: facebook.com/teamix ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
