On 12/12/2016 03:35 PM, Maxim Patlasov wrote:
On 12/12/2016 06:54 AM, David Sterba wrote:
As far as we don't have any NO_THRESHOLD users of
btrfs_workqueue_normal_congested for now, I tend to think it's better to
add a descriptive comment and simply return "false" from
btrfs_workqueue_normal_congested rather than trying to address some
future needs now. See please v2 of the patch.
Thanks, I've got v2 and added a cc for stable to v3.15+, which isn't
exactly right, but its when the new workqueue system was put in place.
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
