On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 04:00:26PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> So here is a new set of patches cleaning up tree-log function 
> w.r.t inode vs btrfs_inode. There are still some which remain 
> but I didn't find compelling arguments to cleaning them up, so 
> I've left them unchanged. This time there are some size shrinkage:
> 
>    text          data     bss     dec     hex filename
>    2530598     174661   28288 2733547  29b5eb fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko - upstream 
> master
> 
>       text       data     bss     dec     hex filename
>       2530774  174661   28288 2733723  29b69b fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko - before 
> tree-log cleanup
> 
>     text         data     bss     dec     hex filename
>       2530163  174661   28288 2733112  29b438 fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko - both series 
> applied 
> 
> So the net result of the 2 series is 435 bytes and I assume there 
> will be further reduction in size once further cleanups are made 

Thanks. I was about to apply the series but patch 06/24 fails to apply
on anytihing that I could use (master, cmason's integration or the
cleanups-next branch). Can you please refresh it on top of master? The
conflict looks like the patch tries to apply the same change twice to
btrfs_del_dir_entries_in_log, so it would be better is you check.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to