On 19.01.2017 20:21, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:31:26AM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>> So here is a new set of patches cleaning up tree-log function 
>> w.r.t inode vs btrfs_inode. There are still some which remain 
>> but I didn't find compelling arguments to cleaning them up, so 
>> I've left them unchanged. This time there are some size shrinkage:
>>
>>    text         data     bss     dec     hex filename
>>    2530598    174661   28288 2733547  29b5eb fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko - upstream 
>> master
>>
>>      text       data     bss     dec     hex filename
>>      2530774  174661   28288 2733723  29b69b fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko - before 
>> tree-log cleanup
>>
>>     text        data     bss     dec     hex filename
>>      2530163  174661   28288 2733112  29b438 fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko - both series 
>> applied 
>>
>> So the net result of the 2 series is 435 bytes and I assume there 
>> will be further reduction in size once further cleanups are made 
>>
>> Changes since v1: 
>>  * Rebased all patche to latest master
>>
>> Nikolay Borisov (24):
>>   btrfs: Make btrfs_must_commit_transaction take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make btrfs_record_unlink_dir take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make btrfs_record_snapshot_destroy take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make btrfs_inode_in_log take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make btrfs_log_new_name take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make btrfs_del_dir_entries_in_log take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make btrfs_del_inode_ref take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make logged_inode_size take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make btrfs_check_ref_name_override take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make copy_items take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make btrfs_log_all_xattrs take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make btrfs_log_trailing_hole take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make btrfs_get_logged_extents take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make btrfs_log_changed_extents take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make log_dir_items take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make log_directory_changes take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make log_new_dir_dentries take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make btrfs_unlink_inode take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make drop_one_dir_item take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make __add_inode_ref take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make log_inode_item take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make btrfs_log_inode take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make count_inode_extrefs take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make count_inode_refs take btrfs_inode
> 
> Added to 4.11 queue, thanks. There were several 80+ lines added by the
> patches, I've updated the patches during review. Please be more careful
> with changes like this
> 
> From https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9522051/
> 
> -     if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) ||
> +     if (S_ISDIR(inode->vfs_inode.i_mode) ||
>           (!test_bit(BTRFS_INODE_NEEDS_FULL_SYNC,
> -                    &BTRFS_I(inode)->runtime_flags) &&
> -          inode_only >= LOG_INODE_EXISTS))
> +                    &inode->runtime_flags) &&
> +          inode_only == LOG_INODE_EXISTS))
> 
> Notice the change from >= to == .

Yeah, I did notice this after the rebase I did when you told me patch 6
wasn't applying cleanly, however I thought I had fixed it during the
rebase. Apparently I do need to recheck things one more time for good
measure.

Anyway, thanks for pulling!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to