Imran Geriskovan posted on Thu, 16 Feb 2017 13:42:09 +0200 as excerpted: > Opps.. I mean 4.9/4.10 Experiences > > On 2/16/17, Imran Geriskovan <[email protected]> wrote: >> What are your experiences for btrfs regarding 4.10 and 4.11 kernels? >> I'm still on 4.8.x. I'd be happy to hear from anyone using 4.1x for a >> very typical single disk setup. Are they reasonably stable/good enough >> for this case?
I ran 4.9 and have been on 4.10 since before rc1. Btrfs has been fine here, tho there have been some late rc7/8 fixes. I've had and still have some 4.10 issues, but they're amdgpu, not btrfs related. (Unfortunately, between working long hours and being sick partly as a result, I've had little time to report them, but booting with amdgpu.dpm=0 has let me continue running 4.10-git, tho I don't know exactly why if I'm not going to have time to report problems anyway.) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
