On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 07:41:01AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 08:15 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > > On 02/20/2017 04:16 AM, Elena Reshetova wrote: > > > Now when new refcount_t type and API are finally merged > > > (see include/linux/refcount.h), the following > > > patches convert various refcounters in the block susystem from > > > atomic_t to refcount_t. By doing this we prevent intentional or > > > accidental underflows or overflows that can led to use-after-free > > > vulnerabilities. > > This description isn't right ... nothing is prevented; we get warnings > on saturation and use after free with this.
The thing that is prevented is overflow and then a use-after-free by making it a leak. Modular stuff, you put and free at: (n+1) mod n, by saturating at n-1 we'll never get there. So you loose use-after-free, you gain a resource leak. The general idea being that use-after-free is a nice trampoline for exploits, leaks are 'only' a DoS. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
