On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:25 AM, Qu Wenruo <quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> [BUG]
> When btrfs_reloc_clone_csum() reports error, it can underflow metadata
> and leads to kernel assertion on outstanding extents in
> run_delalloc_nocow() and cow_file_range().
>
> BTRFS info (device vdb5): relocating block group 12582912 flags data
> BTRFS info (device vdb5): found 1 extents
> assertion failed: inode->outstanding_extents >= num_extents, file:
> fs/btrfs//extent-tree.c, line: 5858
>
> Currently, due to another bug blocking ordered extents, the bug is only
> reproducible under certain block group layout and using error injection.
>
> a) Create one data block group with one 4K extent in it.
> To avoid the bug that hangs btrfs due to ordered extent which never
> finishes
> b) Make btrfs_reloc_clone_csum() always fail
> c) Relocate that block group
>
> [CAUSE]
> run_delalloc_nocow() and cow_file_range() handles error from
> btrfs_reloc_clone_csum() wrongly:
>
> (The ascii chart shows a more generic case of this bug other than the
> bug mentioned above)
>
> |<------------------ delalloc range --------------------------->|
> | OE 1 | OE 2 | ... | OE n |
> |<----------- cleanup range --------------->|
> |<----------- ----------->|
> \/
> btrfs_finish_ordered_io() range
>
> So error handler, which calls extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() with
> EXTENT_DELALLOC and EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNT bits, and btrfs_finish_ordered_io()
> will both cover OE n, and free its metadata, causing metadata under flow.
>
> [Fix]
> The fix is to ensure after calling btrfs_add_ordered_extent(), we only
> call error handler after increasing the iteration offset, so that
> cleanup range won't cover any created ordered extent.
>
> |<------------------ delalloc range --------------------------->|
> | OE 1 | OE 2 | ... | OE n |
> |<----------- ----------->|<---------- cleanup range --------->|
> \/
> btrfs_finish_ordered_io() range
>
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdman...@suse.com>
Thanks
> ---
> v6:
> New, split from v5 patch, as this is a separate bug.
> v7:
> Fix a wrong operator pointed out by Liu Bo.
> Test case will follow soon.
> ---
> fs/btrfs/inode.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> index c40060cc481f..fe588bf30d02 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> @@ -998,15 +998,24 @@ static noinline int cow_file_range(struct inode *inode,
> BTRFS_DATA_RELOC_TREE_OBJECTID) {
> ret = btrfs_reloc_clone_csums(inode, start,
> cur_alloc_size);
> + /*
> + * Only drop cache here, and process as normal.
> + *
> + * We must not allow extent_clear_unlock_delalloc()
> + * at out_unlock label to free meta of this ordered
> + * extent, as its meta should be freed by
> + * btrfs_finish_ordered_io().
> + *
> + * So we must continue until @start is increased to
> + * skip current ordered extent.
> + */
> if (ret)
> - goto out_drop_extent_cache;
> + btrfs_drop_extent_cache(BTRFS_I(inode), start,
> + start + ram_size - 1, 0);
> }
>
> btrfs_dec_block_group_reservations(fs_info, ins.objectid);
>
> - if (disk_num_bytes < cur_alloc_size)
> - break;
> -
> /* we're not doing compressed IO, don't unlock the first
> * page (which the caller expects to stay locked), don't
> * clear any dirty bits and don't set any writeback bits
> @@ -1022,10 +1031,21 @@ static noinline int cow_file_range(struct inode
> *inode,
> delalloc_end, locked_page,
> EXTENT_LOCKED | EXTENT_DELALLOC,
> op);
> - disk_num_bytes -= cur_alloc_size;
> + if (disk_num_bytes < cur_alloc_size)
> + disk_num_bytes = 0;
> + else
> + disk_num_bytes -= cur_alloc_size;
> num_bytes -= cur_alloc_size;
> alloc_hint = ins.objectid + ins.offset;
> start += cur_alloc_size;
> +
> + /*
> + * btrfs_reloc_clone_csums() error, since start is increased
> + * extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() at out_unlock label won't
> + * free metadata of current ordered extent, we're OK to exit.
> + */
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_unlock;
> }
> out:
> return ret;
> @@ -1414,15 +1434,14 @@ static noinline int run_delalloc_nocow(struct inode
> *inode,
> BUG_ON(ret); /* -ENOMEM */
>
> if (root->root_key.objectid ==
> - BTRFS_DATA_RELOC_TREE_OBJECTID) {
> + BTRFS_DATA_RELOC_TREE_OBJECTID)
> + /*
> + * Error handled later, as we must prevent
> + * extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() in error handler
> + * from freeing metadata of created ordered extent.
> + */
> ret = btrfs_reloc_clone_csums(inode, cur_offset,
> num_bytes);
> - if (ret) {
> - if (!nolock && nocow)
> - btrfs_end_write_no_snapshoting(root);
> - goto error;
> - }
> - }
>
> extent_clear_unlock_delalloc(inode, cur_offset,
> cur_offset + num_bytes - 1, end,
> @@ -1434,6 +1453,14 @@ static noinline int run_delalloc_nocow(struct inode
> *inode,
> if (!nolock && nocow)
> btrfs_end_write_no_snapshoting(root);
> cur_offset = extent_end;
> +
> + /*
> + * btrfs_reloc_clone_csums() error, now we're OK to call error
> + * handler, as metadata for created ordered extent will only
> + * be freed by btrfs_finish_ordered_io().
> + */
> + if (ret)
> + goto error;
> if (cur_offset > end)
> break;
> }
> --
> 2.12.0
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
