> + if (unaligned_io) {
> + /* If we are going to wait for other DIO to finish, bail */
> + if ((iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT) &&
> + atomic_read(&inode->i_dio_count))
> + return -EAGAIN;
> inode_dio_wait(inode);
This checks i_dio_count twice in the nowait case, I think it should be:
if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT) {
if (atomic_read(&inode->i_dio_count))
return -EAGAIN;
} else {
inode_dio_wait(inode);
}
> if ((flags & (IOMAP_WRITE | IOMAP_ZERO)) && xfs_is_reflink_inode(ip)) {
> if (flags & IOMAP_DIRECT) {
> + /* A reflinked inode will result in CoW alloc */
> + if (flags & IOMAP_NOWAIT) {
> + error = -EAGAIN;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
This is a bit pessimistic - just because the inode has any shared
extents we could still write into unshared ones. For now I think this
pessimistic check is fine, but the comment should be corrected.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
