On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 06:07:43PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> Following the factoring out of the creation code udpate_space_info can only
> be called for already-existing space_info structs. Remove superfulous error
> handling and use the return value to return a pointer to the found space_info.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nbori...@suse.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jeff Mahoney <je...@suse.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 68 
> ++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> 
> Change since v1
>  - Incorporated Jeff Mahoney's feedback and added his reviewed-by tag
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> index 28848e45b018..3d5bf0b7f719 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> @@ -3959,10 +3959,10 @@ static int create_space_info(struct btrfs_fs_info 
> *info, u64 flags,
>       return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static int update_space_info(struct btrfs_fs_info *info, u64 flags,
> -                          u64 total_bytes, u64 bytes_used,
> -                          u64 bytes_readonly,
> -                          struct btrfs_space_info **space_info)
> +static struct btrfs_space_info *update_space_info(struct btrfs_fs_info *info,
> +                                                                             
>                  u64 flags, u64 total_bytes,
> +                                                                             
>                  u64 bytes_used,
> +                                                                             
>                  u64 bytes_readonly)

The format shown here is not indented correctly.  Please check the tool you
generated the patch or the email client.

I remember that your previous patch set about converting struct inode to struct
btrfs_inode also breaks several indent in code.

>  {
>       struct btrfs_space_info *found;
>       int factor;
> @@ -3974,21 +3974,21 @@ static int update_space_info(struct btrfs_fs_info 
> *info, u64 flags,
>               factor = 1;
>  
>       found = __find_space_info(info, flags);
> -     if (found) {
> -             spin_lock(&found->lock);
> -             found->total_bytes += total_bytes;
> -             found->disk_total += total_bytes * factor;
> -             found->bytes_used += bytes_used;
> -             found->disk_used += bytes_used * factor;
> -             found->bytes_readonly += bytes_readonly;
> -             if (total_bytes > 0)
> -                     found->full = 0;
> -             space_info_add_new_bytes(info, found, total_bytes -
> -                                      bytes_used - bytes_readonly);
> -             spin_unlock(&found->lock);
> -             *space_info = found;
> -             return 0;
> -     }
> +     BUG_ON(!found);

No more BUG_ON(), try ASSERT for debugging purpose.

> +
> +     spin_lock(&found->lock);
> +     found->total_bytes += total_bytes;
> +     found->disk_total += total_bytes * factor;
> +     found->bytes_used += bytes_used;
> +     found->disk_used += bytes_used * factor;
> +     found->bytes_readonly += bytes_readonly;
> +     if (total_bytes > 0)
> +             found->full = 0;
> +     space_info_add_new_bytes(info, found, total_bytes -
> +                              bytes_used - bytes_readonly);
> +     spin_unlock(&found->lock);
> +
> +     return found;
>  }
>  
>  static void set_avail_alloc_bits(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 flags)
> @@ -10042,19 +10042,9 @@ int btrfs_read_block_groups(struct btrfs_fs_info 
> *info)
>               }
>  
>               trace_btrfs_add_block_group(info, cache, 0);
> -             ret = update_space_info(info, cache->flags, found_key.offset,
> -                                     btrfs_block_group_used(&cache->item),
> -                                     cache->bytes_super, &space_info);
> -             if (ret) {
> -                     btrfs_remove_free_space_cache(cache);
> -                     spin_lock(&info->block_group_cache_lock);
> -                     rb_erase(&cache->cache_node,
> -                              &info->block_group_cache_tree);
> -                     RB_CLEAR_NODE(&cache->cache_node);
> -                     spin_unlock(&info->block_group_cache_lock);
> -                     btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
> -                     goto error;
> -             }
> +             space_info = update_space_info(info, cache->flags, 
> found_key.offset,
> +                                                                       
> btrfs_block_group_used(&cache->item),
> +                                                                       
> cache->bytes_super);
>

Same indent issue.

>               cache->space_info = space_info;
>  
> @@ -10212,18 +10202,8 @@ int btrfs_make_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle 
> *trans,
>        * the rbtree, update the space info's counters.
>        */
>       trace_btrfs_add_block_group(fs_info, cache, 1);
> -     ret = update_space_info(fs_info, cache->flags, size, bytes_used,
> -                             cache->bytes_super, &cache->space_info);
> -     if (ret) {
> -             btrfs_remove_free_space_cache(cache);
> -             spin_lock(&fs_info->block_group_cache_lock);
> -             rb_erase(&cache->cache_node,
> -                      &fs_info->block_group_cache_tree);
> -             RB_CLEAR_NODE(&cache->cache_node);
> -             spin_unlock(&fs_info->block_group_cache_lock);
> -             btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
> -             return ret;
> -     }
> +     cache->space_info = update_space_info(fs_info, cache->flags, size,
> +                                                                             
>  bytes_used, cache->bytes_super);

Same indent issue.

Thanks,

-liubo
>       update_global_block_rsv(fs_info);
>  
>       __link_block_group(cache->space_info, cache);
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to