On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Qu Wenruo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> At 05/22/2017 09:58 AM, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Qu Wenruo <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> At 05/20/2017 04:39 PM, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This change follows the change to automatically remove qgroups
>>>> if the associated subvolume has also been removed. It changes
>>>> the default behaviour to automatically remove qgroups when
>>>> a subvolume is deleted, but this can be override with the
>>>> qgroup_keep mount flag.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sargun Dhillon <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>>    fs/btrfs/ctree.h |  1 +
>>>>    fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>>>    fs/btrfs/super.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
>>>>    3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
>>>> index 643c70d..4d57eb6 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
>>>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
>>>> @@ -1348,6 +1348,7 @@ static inline u32 BTRFS_MAX_XATTR_SIZE(const
>>>> struct
>>>> btrfs_fs_info *info)
>>>>    #define BTRFS_MOUNT_FRAGMENT_METADATA (1 << 25)
>>>>    #define BTRFS_MOUNT_FREE_SPACE_TREE   (1 << 26)
>>>>    #define BTRFS_MOUNT_NOLOGREPLAY               (1 << 27)
>>>> +#define BTRFS_MOUNT_QGROUP_KEEP                (1 << 28)
>>>>      #define BTRFS_DEFAULT_COMMIT_INTERVAL       (30)
>>>>    #define BTRFS_DEFAULT_MAX_INLINE      (2048)
>>>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
>>>> index e176375..b10d7bb 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
>>>> @@ -2544,6 +2544,20 @@ static noinline int
>>>> btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy(struct
>>>> file *file,
>>>>                  }
>>>>          }
>>>>    +     /*
>>>> +        * Attempt to automatically remove the automatically attached
>>>> qgroup
>>>> +        * setup in btrfs_qgroup_inherit. As a matter of convention, the
>>>> id
>>>> +        * is the same as the subvolume id.
>>>> +        *
>>>> +        * This can fail non-fatally for level 0 qgroups, and
>>>> potentially
>>>> +        * leave the filesystem in an awkward, (but working) state.
>>>> +        */
>>>> +       if (!btrfs_test_opt(fs_info, QGROUP_KEEP)) {
>>>> +               ret = btrfs_remove_qgroup(trans, fs_info,
>>>> +                                         dest->root_key.objectid);
>>>> +               if (ret && ret != -ENOENT)
>>>> +                       pr_info("Could not automatically delete qgroup:
>>>> %d\n", ret);
>>>> +       }
>>>>    out_end_trans:
>>>>          trans->block_rsv = NULL;
>>>>          trans->bytes_reserved = 0;
>>>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
>>>> index 4f1cdd5..232e1b8 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
>>>> @@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ enum {
>>>>          Opt_commit_interval, Opt_barrier, Opt_nodefrag, Opt_nodiscard,
>>>>          Opt_noenospc_debug, Opt_noflushoncommit, Opt_acl, Opt_datacow,
>>>>          Opt_datasum, Opt_treelog, Opt_noinode_cache, Opt_usebackuproot,
>>>> -       Opt_nologreplay, Opt_norecovery,
>>>> +       Opt_nologreplay, Opt_norecovery, Opt_qgroup_keep,
>>>> Opt_qgroup_nokeep,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I prefer to add new meanings for btrfs_ioctl_qgroup_create_args->create.
So, just to bring this full circle before I do a v2, we want to make
it so on creation time, or after creation time you can make a qgroup
autoremove. And we want this to be a flag that gets inherited if
SUBVOL_QGROUP_INHERIT is set?

>>
>> I have two issues with this:
>> 1) Existing software, like Docker Daemon. There's no way I can tell
>> Docker daemon to use this new flag to create qgroups. Although, I
>> could modify it, it doesn't fit into the API very well.
>> 2) How do I do this with qgroups that already exist, or qgroups that
>> are created on-demand by qgroup_inherit?
>>
>> I think both of these would be fixed if we copied (a subset) of the
>> qgroup flags. If you look at my other patches, I think we want to
>> remove the ability to remove level-0 qgroups (which are inherited), so
>> we'd also want to add an ioctl to be able to modify (some of those)
>> flags. Do you think that adding inheritance, and a new ioctl is a
>> reasonable approach?
>
>
> Sorry, I didn't see later patches.
>
> Yes, new API is a better method to solve this problem.
>
> But with new APIs, the need of new mount option is even less.
> Outputting a warning message in dmesg is good enough to info user to use new
> API.
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
>
>
>>
>>>
>>> It's a u64 value while we only checks if it's zero or not, to determine
>>> if
>>> it's creation or deletion.
>>>
>>> We could reuse it to extent the create/delete behavior, other than a new
>>> mount option, which is a global flag, just to alter qgroup behavior.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Qu
>>>
>>>
>>>>    #ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG
>>>>          Opt_fragment_data, Opt_fragment_metadata, Opt_fragment_all,
>>>>    #endif
>>>> @@ -381,6 +381,8 @@ static const match_table_t tokens = {
>>>>          {Opt_rescan_uuid_tree, "rescan_uuid_tree"},
>>>>          {Opt_fatal_errors, "fatal_errors=%s"},
>>>>          {Opt_commit_interval, "commit=%d"},
>>>> +       {Opt_qgroup_keep, "qgroup_keep"},
>>>> +       {Opt_qgroup_nokeep, "qgroup_nokeep"},
>>>>    #ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG
>>>>          {Opt_fragment_data, "fragment=data"},
>>>>          {Opt_fragment_metadata, "fragment=metadata"},
>>>> @@ -808,6 +810,14 @@ int btrfs_parse_options(struct btrfs_fs_info *info,
>>>> char *options,
>>>>                                  info->commit_interval =
>>>> BTRFS_DEFAULT_COMMIT_INTERVAL;
>>>>                          }
>>>>                          break;
>>>> +               case Opt_qgroup_keep:
>>>> +                       btrfs_set_and_info(info, QGROUP_KEEP,
>>>> +                                          "do not automatically delete
>>>> qgroups");
>>>> +                       break;
>>>> +               case Opt_qgroup_nokeep:
>>>> +                       btrfs_clear_and_info(info, QGROUP_KEEP,
>>>> +                                            "automatically delete
>>>> qgroups");
>>>> +                       break;
>>>>    #ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG
>>>>                  case Opt_fragment_all:
>>>>                          btrfs_info(info, "fragmenting all space");
>>>> @@ -1299,6 +1309,10 @@ static int btrfs_show_options(struct seq_file
>>>> *seq,
>>>> struct dentry *dentry)
>>>>                  seq_puts(seq, ",fatal_errors=panic");
>>>>          if (info->commit_interval != BTRFS_DEFAULT_COMMIT_INTERVAL)
>>>>                  seq_printf(seq, ",commit=%d", info->commit_interval);
>>>> +       if (btrfs_test_opt(info, QGROUP_KEEP))
>>>> +               seq_puts(seq, ",qgroup_keep");
>>>> +       else
>>>> +               seq_puts(seq, ",qgroup_nokeep");
>>>>    #ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG
>>>>          if (btrfs_test_opt(info, FRAGMENT_DATA))
>>>>                  seq_puts(seq, ",fragment=data");
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to